<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science fiction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bahaiblog.net/2005/09/28/science-fiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bahaiblog.net/2005/09/28/science-fiction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dan jones</title>
		<link>http://www.bahaiblog.net/2005/09/28/science-fiction/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>dan jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bahaiblog.net/?p=94#comment-135</guid>
		<description>uuuhhhhhhhhhhhh
"science fiction professionals"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uuuhhhhhhhhhhhh<br />
&#8220;science fiction professionals&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matarael</title>
		<link>http://www.bahaiblog.net/2005/09/28/science-fiction/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Matarael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bahaiblog.net/?p=94#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Of course, to be fair we need to understand that the Nanobison site is posting something which is clearly demarked as far as the publication itself is concerned as "speculative fiction".  Fiction being the keyword.  This same point is also applicable for the IROSF.

There is no doubt, even to the author that when measured by even the least rigorous scholarly methodology the article would be shot down, and never published in say for example an academic journal.  But as a work of fiction when looked at objectively it could even be considered to be quite intriguing... Especially if the publisher or reader has never heard of the Baha'i Faith and thinks the whole thing is a remarkable work of imagination. :)  When considered in that light both stories take on a completely different light.

Of course, when put in perspective the article is insensitive to the actual beliefs of the worldwide community of 5 million Baha'is, whether intentionally or unintentionally.  This reality is not anything new or different: as individuals everyone has the right to choose how to treat other's belief systems.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, to be fair we need to understand that the Nanobison site is posting something which is clearly demarked as far as the publication itself is concerned as &#8220;speculative fiction&#8221;.  Fiction being the keyword.  This same point is also applicable for the IROSF.</p>
<p>There is no doubt, even to the author that when measured by even the least rigorous scholarly methodology the article would be shot down, and never published in say for example an academic journal.  But as a work of fiction when looked at objectively it could even be considered to be quite intriguing&#8230; Especially if the publisher or reader has never heard of the Baha&#8217;i Faith and thinks the whole thing is a remarkable work of imagination. :)  When considered in that light both stories take on a completely different light.</p>
<p>Of course, when put in perspective the article is insensitive to the actual beliefs of the worldwide community of 5 million Baha&#8217;is, whether intentionally or unintentionally.  This reality is not anything new or different: as individuals everyone has the right to choose how to treat other&#8217;s belief systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dg</title>
		<link>http://www.bahaiblog.net/2005/09/28/science-fiction/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>dg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bahaiblog.net/?p=94#comment-124</guid>
		<description>when one's intention is to rewrite history, he needs no sources but his own imagination.  :)

i don't know...i find the follow up story neither well-written nor interesting.  maybe it's just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when one&#8217;s intention is to rewrite history, he needs no sources but his own imagination.  :)</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t know&#8230;i find the follow up story neither well-written nor interesting.  maybe it&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
